Those in support of the new vetting and barring scheme for adults who help out regularly at children's sports clubs etc seem to have missed the other reason for the lack of enthusiasm among us tediously uncooperative parents. It's not just the cost, and the nuisance, it's the fact that most of us don't believe that schemes like this protect children from abuse.
The most dangerous place for children, statistically, is their own homes. But we can't vet and bar parents, or parents' boyfriends, or lodgers, so we have this instead. It's a well meant waste of - potentially - 11.3 million people's time, but let's not kid ourselves that it's solving the main problem. For every Ian Huntley, or Ian Brady, there are many abusive and murderous parents. Sometimes it almost seems as though the government wants us not to remember this. I wonder why.